Billy Bragg Now Blasts Both Morrissey and Defender Brandon Flowers
"I have to wonder if Flowers really understands the ramifications of Morrissey's expressions of support for the far right For Britain Party"
Published Jul 08, 2019Billy Bragg made headlines recently for taking a verbal swing at the increasingly controversial Morrissey, saying "I think he's decided that he wants to betray everything he ever said in the Smiths." Now Bragg is doubling down, penning a massive Facebook essay lambasting not only Morrissey but also the Killers frontman Brandon Flowers, who recently said Moz is "still king" despite all his views.
Bragg spent his Sunday (July 7) on Facebook, where he published a massive essay slamming Morrissey and Flowers, expanding on his views of what it means for Moz to show support for a far-right political group and what it means for Flowers to then defend the Smiths singer.
"I have to wonder if Flowers really understands the ramifications of Morrissey's expressions of support for the far right For Britain Party," Bragg wrote. "As the writer of the powerful Killers song 'Land of the Free,' does he know that For Britain wants to build the kind of barriers to immigration that Flowers condemns in that lyric?"
And that's just the tip of the iceberg. Down below, you can see Bragg's full Facebook essay.
Last Sunday, while much of the British media were lauding Stormzy's Glastonbury headline show as epoch defining, Morrissey posted a white supremacist video on his website, accompanied by the comment 'Nothing But Blue Skies for Stormzy...The Gallows for Morrissey'. The nine minute clip lifted footage from the grime star's Pyramid Stage performance while arguing that the British establishment are using him to promote multiculturalism at the expense of white culture.
The YouTube channel of the video's author contains other clips expressing , among other things, homophobia, racism and misogyny - left wing women of colour are a favourite target for his ire. There are also clips expounding the Great Replacement Theory, a far right conspiracy trope which holds that there is a plot of obliterate the white populations of Europe and North America through mass immigration and cultural warfare.
My first thought was to wonder what kind of websites Morrissey must be trawling in order to be able to find and repost this clip on the same day that it appeared online? I came home from Glastonbury expecting to see some angry responses to his endorsement of white supremacism. Instead, the NME published an interview with Brandon Flowers in which the Killers lead singer proclaimed that Morrissey was still "a king", despite being in what Flowers recognised was "hot water" over his bigoted comments.
As the week progressed, I kept waiting for some reaction to the white supremacist video, yet none was forthcoming. Every time I googled Morrissey, up would pop another article from a music website echoing the NME's original headline: 'The Killers Brandon Flowers on Morrissey: 'He's Still A King'. I'm well aware from personal experience how easy it is for an artist to find something you've said in the context of a longer discourse turned into an inflammatory headline that doesn't reflect your genuine views on the subject at hand, but I have to wonder if Flowers really understands the ramifications of Morrissey's expressions of support for the far right For Britain Party?
As the writer of the powerful Killers song 'Land of the Free', does he know that For Britain wants to build the kind of barriers to immigration that Flowers condemns in that lyric?
Party leader Anne Marie Walters maintains ties with Generation Identity, the group who both inspired and received funds from the gunman who murdered 50 worshippers at a Christchurch mosque. How does that sit with the condemnation of mass murder by lone gunman in 'Land of the Free'?
As an explicitly anti-Muslim party, For Britain opposes the religious slaughter of animals without the use of a stun gun, a policy that has given Morrissey a fig leaf of respectability, allowing him to claim he supports them on animal welfare grounds. Yet if that is his primary concern, why does he not support the UK's Animal Welfare Party, which stood candidates in the recent European elections?
Among their policies, the AWF also aim to prohibit non-stun slaughter. If his only interest was to end this practice, he could have achieved this without the taint of Islamophobia by endorsing them. They are a tiny party, but Morrissey's vocal support would have given the animal rights movement a huge boost of publicity ahead of the polls.
Instead, he expresses support for anti-Muslim provocateurs, posts white supremacist videos and, when challenged, clutches his pearls and cries "Infamy, infamy, they've all got it in for me". His recent claim that "as a so-called entertainer, I have no rights" is a ridiculous position made all the more troubling by the fact that it is a common trope among right-wing reactionaries.
The notion that certain individuals are not allowed to say certain things is spurious, not least because it is most often invoked after they've made their offensive comments. Look closely at their claims and you'll find that what they are actually complaining about is the fact that they have been challenged.
The concept of freedom pushed by the new generation of free speech warriors maintains that the individual has the right to say whatever they want, whenever they want, to whoever they want, with no comeback. If that is the definition of freedom, then one need look no further than Donald Trump's Twitter feed as our generation's beacon of liberty. Perhaps Lady Liberty should be replaced in New York Harbour with a colossal sculpture of the Donald, wearing a toga, holding a gaslight.
Worryingly, Morrissey's reaction to being challenged over his support of For Britain, his willingness to double down rather than apologise for any offence caused, suggests a commitment to a bigotry that tarnishes his persona as the champion of the outsider. Where once he offered solace to the victims of a cruel and unjust world, he now seems to have joined the bullies waiting outside the school gates.
As an activist, I'm appalled by this transformation, but as a Smiths fan, I'm heartbroken.
It was Johnny Marr's amazing guitar that drew me to the band, but I grasped that Morrissey was an exceptional lyricist when I heard 'Reel Around the Fountain'. Ironically, it was a line that he had stolen that won my affections. "I dreamt about you last night and I fell out of bed twice" is spoken by Jimmy, the black sailor, to his white teenage lover, Jo, in Sheila Delaney's play 'A Taste of Honey'.
The 1961 movie, starring Rita Tushingham was an early example of a post-war British society that would embrace multi-racial relationships (and homosexuality too). By pilfering that particular line for the song, Morrissey was placing the Smiths in the great tradition of northern working class culture that may have been in the gutter, but was looking at the stars. Yet, by posting a white supremacist video in which he is quoted as saying "Everyone prefers their own race", Morrissey undermines that line, erasing Jo and Jimmy and all those misfit lovers to whom the Smiths once gave so much encouragement.
A week has passed since the video appeared on Morrissey's website and nothing has been written in the media to challenge his position. Today it was reported that research by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a UK based anti-extremist organisation, reveals that the Great Replacement Theory is being promoted so effectively by the far right that it is entering mainstream political discourse.
That Morrissey is helping to spread this idea — which inspired the Christchurch mosque murderer — is beyond doubt. Those who claim that this has no relevance to his stature as an artist should ask themselves if, by demanding that we separate the singer from the song, they too are helping to propagate this racist creed.